Examining the Automotive Sector through BlueGreen Alliance Research
September 16, 2026
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Driving Growth: How Clean Cars and Climate Policy Can Create Jobs (2010) | Supplying Ingenuity: US Suppliers of Clean Fuel Efficient Vehicle Technologies (2011) | Gearing Up: Smart Standards Create Good Jobs Building Cleaner Cars (2012) |
| Alan Baum, Michigan Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MI MEP) for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Center for American Progress (CAP), UAW | NRDC, National Wildlife Federation (NWF), UAW; supplier data collected by Alan Baum | BGA, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), NRDC, NWF, UAW, Sierra Club; modeling by Skip Laitner |
| Modeled expansion or first application of 15 technologies and components for fleet to meet more stringent fuel economy standards to calculate jobs | Identified manufacturing facilities that make 13 categories of fuel economy products modeled to meet 2015-2025 standards, reported employment at those facilities | Modeled vehicle costs and fuel savings to implement 2017-2025 fuel economy standards to calculate consumer savings and jobs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Supplying Ingenuity II: US Suppliers of Clean, Fuel-Efficient Vehicle Technologies (2017) | Driving Investment: Fuel Efficiency is Rebuilding American Manufacturing (2018) | Tech @ Risk: The Domestic Innovation, Technology, Deployment, Manufacturing, and Jobs at Risk in Stepping Away from Global Leadership on Clean Cars (2019) |
| NRDC, BGA, Alan Baum | BGA | BGA, UCS did some analysis |
| Update to first report; identified facilities that make 11 categories of fuel economy products modeled to meet standards through 2025, reported employment at those facilities | Reframes “costs” of fuel economy standards to critical and robust reinvestments of $76 billion over last decade in over 100 auto plants across the country | Analysis calculates jobs lost/foregone because of fuel economy standard rollbacks, compares to similar analyses, then shows which facilities make specific products in 5 categories and 37 products |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Taking the High Road: Strategies for a Fair EV Future (2018) | EVs At A Crossroads: Challenges and Opportunities for the Future of US Manufacturing and Jobs (2018) | EV Backgrounder: EVs Are Coming. Will They Be Made in the USA? (2021) |
| UAW | BGA | BGA, UAW, USW, AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council (AFL IUC) |
| Outlines coming shift to EVs, frames as opportunity to reinvest in U.S. manufacturing if combined with proactive industrial policy to ensure high-quality jobs. Detailed overview of EVs and how they differ from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, challenges (ICE manufacturing supply chain) and opportunities that need to be addressed in industrial policy. | Report makes the case that the United States has an EV supply chain but needs ongoing policy to drive competitiveness, maintain jobs and job quality. Shows diagram of EV sales; map of facilities in EV manufacturing supply chain (from BGA auto data) | Released ahead of Economic Policy Institute (EPI) report as a preview/framing; covers factors likely to drive U.S. job gains and job losses related to electrification of vehicles for the industry and broader economy. Focus on maintaining/creating good, safe jobs. These factors are the considerations going into the modeling for the EPI report. |
![]() |
![]() |
| Economic Policy Institute (EPI) Light Duty Report The Stakes for Workers in How Policymakers Manage the Coming Shift to All-Electric Vehicles (2021) | EPI Heavy Duty report What future will U.S. truck manufacturing have under Trump? (2025) |
| EPI, Jim Barrett, with BGA, UAW, USW, AFL IUC | EPI with BGA, UAW, USW, AFL |
| Reports likely employment and job-quality implications of a large-scale shift to light duty battery electric vehicles (BEVs) under various scenarios modeled in IMPLAN that are shaped by policy, including manufacturing/domestic content and trade policies. | Reports likely employment and job-quality implications of a large-scale shift to heavy duty BEVs under various scenarios modeled in IMPLAN that are shaped by policy, including manufacturing/domestic content and trade policies. |
- Comments and recommendations in response to the Federal Highway Administration’s Request for Comment on the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Grant Program in the BIL as well as guidance for the associated State EV Infrastructure Deployment Plans focused on supporting workers installing charging infrastructure across the country (2022)
- Comments and recommendations in response to the Treasury and IRS Request For Comments on the Inflation Reduction Act Amendments to the Clean Vehicle Tax Credit (30D) (2022) in the Inflation Reduction Act as well as an overview blog (2023). We highlighted the importance of the battery component and critical mineral requirements plus the North American final assembly requirement to ensure job creation, rebuild auto manufacturing communities across the country, and secure an essential supply chain for climate action.
- S. Department of Energy Request for Information on the Domestic Manufacturing Conversion Grant Program (2023) and focus on Small & Medium-Sized Manufacturers (2024). Our comments outline how the program can target investments and serve its function to redress harms inflicted on auto workers and their communities by poor trade, labor, industrial policies, and disinvestment of the past. We cite analysis from our automotive supply chain data, specifically the ICE manufacturers.
- Our blog on Buy America waivers for EV chargers (2023) breaks down what Buy America policies do, why they are important, and how waivers can be strategically used to maximize the impact of such policies.










